Cleanlist vs Others

See how Cleanlist stacks up against the other major B2B data platforms. Every price on these 6 pages was read off the vendor’s own pricing page on or after , each page carrying the date its own vendor was last read, and where a vendor publishes none, the page says so rather than guessing.

25+ providers in one waterfall98% verified work email, 500-lead benchmarkOne shared credit wallet, no per-seat fee

Book more meetings with cleaner data

One waterfall across every provider we hold a contract with, measured on one stratified 500-lead benchmark, reported with its denominator.

Search is free and unlimited on every plan. A verified work email costs 1 credit however many providers it took to find, a direct dial 10, both together 11, validation 0.5 and AI qualification 5. A miss costs nothing, and the credits come out of one wallet the whole team shares.

Every other head-to-head

Pick a tool to see the head-to-head breakdown.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which data enrichment tool is most accurate?
Accuracy varies by data type and geography. Cleanlist achieves 98%+ email deliverability through waterfall enrichment across 25+ providers. ZoomInfo leads on US firmographic data, while Cognism excels in European GDPR-compliant records. The most accurate approach is multi-provider waterfall enrichment, which combines the best data from each source.
Which data enrichment tool is best for startups?
For startups, Cleanlist and Apollo offer the best value. Cleanlist provides 30 free credits with full waterfall enrichment access, while Apollo's free plan grants 900 credits per seat per year, released monthly, against its single database (apollo.io/pricing, checked 2026-08-07). Cleanlist is ideal if you need maximum data coverage from day one without enterprise pricing.
How do I choose between single-provider and multi-provider enrichment?
Single-provider tools (Apollo, ZoomInfo, Lusha) are simpler but limited to one database. Multi-provider waterfall enrichment (Cleanlist, Clay) queries multiple sources in sequence for 20-40% higher match rates. Choose single-provider if you only need basic contact data; choose waterfall if coverage and accuracy are critical.
What should I look for in a data enrichment tool?
Evaluate five key dimensions: data accuracy (verified deliverability rates), coverage (number of providers and records), pricing transparency (credit-based vs per-seat), integrations (CRM and workflow compatibility), and compliance (GDPR, CCPA). Request a trial with your own data to test real-world match rates before committing.
Can I switch data enrichment tools without losing data?
Yes. Most tools support CSV export and CRM integration, making migration straightforward. Cleanlist offers a free migration path, import your existing contact lists, re-enrich them with waterfall enrichment, and compare match rates against your current provider before fully switching.

Gain full access for 14 days.

250 credits, 3 seats, no card needed. Access to every feature except public API & MCP.

When the trial ends the Free plan stays open at 30 credits a month. Paid plans are $79, $229 and $599 a month, 25% off annually.