Map Every Buying Committee Before You Book the Meeting
BDRs win accounts by working several people at once. Cleanlist AI finds the decision-makers at a target account and adds verified emails and phone numbers, from one credit wallet.
Cleanlist AI mapping the buying committee at target accounts (Linear, PostHog, Statsig): a people search on each account's domain (Vice President, Director, Manager · Sales, Operations, Marketing, Finance · Updated after Mar 2026 · Max 6 per company · United States · Not in my lists · Skip HubSpot active within 30 days) finds 6 people per account, each with a role (VP of Sales, Head of RevOps, Director of Sales Ops, VP of Marketing, Sales Ops Manager, VP of Finance), then the waterfall verifies every work email and finds 4 phone numbers.
10,000+ users, from founders to full sales teams
- Switched from
ZoomInfo - Case study
HackerOneSwitched from
Apollo- Switched from
Clay - Case study
Sumo LogicSwitched from
Clay- Switched from
Apollo - Case study
- Switched from
ZoomInfo - Switched from
ZoomInfo
The short answer
Map the buying committee, then reach all of it. People Search pulls the relevant decision-makers at a named account, and the 25+ provider waterfall adds verified emails and phone numbers (98% verified work emails and 85% phone numbers on our 500-lead benchmark). ICP scoring shows which accounts deserve the time. Multi-threading costs credits per contact, 1 per verified work email, from one team wallet starting at $49 a seat a month.
BDRs: what gets in the way.
Account-based deals stall when a BDR can reach only one person per account.
- 01
One contact per account stalls the deal
Enterprise deals need several stakeholders engaged. A tool that surfaces one best contact per company hides the rest of the committee, and the deal stalls when that one person goes quiet.
- 02
Account research lives in a dozen tabs
Before reaching out, a BDR pieces together org structure, headcount and recent news from a dozen browser tabs. That caps how many accounts one rep can work in a week.
- 03
Wrong contacts waste the AE's calendar
A meeting with someone who can't buy burns an AE slot and costs you the AE's trust. Without company and role data, you can't tell a champion from a dead end before you reach out.
- 04
Going wide gets expensive
Multi-threading means enriching many contacts per account. When every contact is expensive, reps go single-threaded to save budget.
The Cleanlist AI qualification agent scoring 5 accounts against the ICP: Linear 93, PostHog 86, Statsig 78, Customer.io 61, Mashgin 38. The top result shows its reasons: Industry and headcount inside your ICP; Sales team large enough for your product; Buying committee fully mapped; - No existing opportunity in your CRM.
How Cleanlist AI fits.
Find the committee in People Search, then reach each person on it with a verified email or phone number.
- 01
Find the whole buying committee
Search a target account and pull the economic buyer, champion, technical evaluator and likely blocker, then enrich them with verified emails and phone numbers. You start multi-threaded on day one.
- 02
Account context for the first touch
Each contact comes back with company size, industry, location and seniority. AI columns can research anything else you need, so the first email mentions something true about the account.
- 03
ICP scores to rank accounts
Score enriched accounts against your ideal profile and spend your hours on the committees most likely to convert.
- 04
Lists the AE can trust
With 25+ providers per contact, the waterfall found 98% verified work emails and 85% phone numbers on our 500-lead benchmark. The meetings you book are with the people you meant to reach.
- Verified work emails25 leads searched23 × 123
- Phone numbersVerified before anyone calls18 × 10180
- Qualification agentFit score with reasons25 × 5125
How the alternatives compare.
ZoomInfo and Cognism are the enterprise picks. Apollo and Clay suit smaller or more technical BDR teams.
| Option | Where it fits | Where it stops |
|---|---|---|
| ZoomInfo Compare | Deep account data, org charts, and intent signals for enterprise BDR motions | $15K+ yearly minimums on annual per-seat contracts; heavy if you mainly need accurate committee data |
| Apollo Compare | Account-based views with sequences built in for BDR outbound | One database, so a missing record stays missing; per-seat pricing grows with the team |
| Cognism Compare | Phone-verified mobiles and strong European coverage for multi-threading abroad | Annual contracts and per-seat pricing; narrower database outside its core regions |
| Clay Compare | Flexible account-research workflows for technical BDR teams | 20-40 hours to build plus ongoing upkeep, and per-run credit burn that's hard to forecast |
What are the best prospecting tools for BDRs?
Pick a tool that finds the whole buying committee and gives you data accurate enough that booked meetings hold. Cleanlist AI does that with People Search, company enrichment and a 25+ provider waterfall. ZoomInfo and Cognism are the strong enterprise alternatives, and our roundup of the best sales intelligence platforms covers the rest.
How does Cleanlist AI help BDRs multi-thread?
People Search returns every relevant persona at a target account, and the waterfall adds verified emails and phone numbers. You reach the economic buyer, champion and technical evaluator in parallel, so the deal doesn't hang on one contact.
Can Cleanlist AI tell BDRs which accounts to prioritize?
Yes. ICP scoring rates each enriched account against your ideal profile, using company fit and anything your AI columns research. BDRs work the committees most likely to convert first.
Why does data accuracy matter more for BDRs than raw volume?
Because a BDR is measured on meetings that hold. A meeting with a stale contact or the wrong role wastes an AE slot and strains the BDR-to-AE relationship. Cleanlist AI's waterfall found 98% verified work emails and 85% phone numbers on our 500-lead benchmark, so the committee you map is one you can reach.
Is Cleanlist AI affordable for a BDR team working many contacts per account?
Yes. Enrichment costs credits per contact (1 per verified work email, 10 per phone number) from one team wallet, and every seat adds to it. Starter is $49 a seat a month for 750 credits, with 25% off annual.
Agents that run your GTM.
Map one target account's buying committee on the 14-day Pro trial, with 250 credits, 3 seats and no card.
14 days of Pro, free.
